Login here
Podcast Location:
Sorry, this podcast has been removed as it is now out of date
Law Categories:
Property Law
CPD Points:
Up to one point - details »

Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority / ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain ½ an accredited CPD point (30 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Cost:
Standard rate: £25+VAT - Corporate users will pay less.
Length:
30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
Plays on Computer:
Yes Downloadable as MP3:    Yes
Contributor(s):
Course Aims:

This podcast aims to give an overview of the main issues raised by boundary disputes: the types of evidence that may be admissible in court in ascertaining the true location of the boundary (including the status of acts subsequent to the original conveyance); issues of expert evidence; the status of informal boundary agreements; and court and Land Registry procedure and practice

Outcomes:
After completing the course you will:
  • Understand the types of evidence that may be admissible in court in ascertaining the true location of the boundary (including the status of acts subsequent to the original conveyance);
  • Understand the place of expert evidence, and how it should be managed;
  • Understand the significance of more or less informal boundary agreements;
  • Have an overview of court and Land Registry procedure and practice.
Level:
Intermediate Difficulty: of 5
Classification:
Legal Principles
Practical Guide
Sources and References:
  • Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s.2;
  • Land Registration Act 2002 ;
  • Land Registry Rules 2003;
  • Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley [1999] 1 WLR 894;
  • Ali v Lane [2006] EWCA Civ 1532; Times, December 4, 2006 (CA (Civ Div));
  • Beale v Harvey [2004] 2 P&CR 18;
  • Clarke v O’Keefe (1997) 80 P&CR 126, 133;
  • Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row [2008] UKHL 55;
  • Derbyshire CC v Fallon [2007] EWHC 1326 (Ch); [2007] 3 E.G.L.R. 44 (Ch D);
  • Falkingham v. Farley, The Times, 11 March 1991;
  • Fisher v. Winch [1939] 1 K.B. 666, C.A.;
  • Hopgood v Brown [1955] 1 WLR 213;
  • Joyce v Rigolli [2004] EWCA Civ 79; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 234 (CA (Civ Div));
  • Neilson v Poole [1969] 20 P&CR 909;
  • L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tools Sales Limited [1974] AC 235;
  • St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance and Another v Clark (No 2) [1973] 1 WLR 1572;
  • Strachey v Ramage [2008] EWCA Civ 384; [2008] 2 P. & C.R. 8 (CA (Civ Div));
  • Wigginton & Milner Ltd. v. Winster Engineering Ltd. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 1462;
  • Yaxley v Gotts [2000] Ch 162, [1999] 3 WLR 1217, [2001] 1 All ER 711, CA.

This podcast is an introduction to the topic of boundary disputes: how they arise, how the courts approach them, and how they can be settled or otherwise resolved.

This podcast has now been removed from the site. It is no longer suitable for CPD purposes as it contains information that is out of date or incorrect. For a list of our latest CPDcasts, please visit the library.

© CPDcast.com