Podcast Location:
Download it here [file size: 22.2 MB]
Categories:
Real Estate & Property Law
CPD Points:
Up to 1 point. details »

Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)

Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Cost:
  • FREE
Length:
30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
Plays on Computer:
Yes Downloadable as MP3:    Yes
Contributor(s):
Course Aims:

This podcast aims to give an overview of the main issues raised by boundary disputes: the types of evidence that may be admissible in court in ascertaining the true location of the boundary (including the status of acts subsequent to the original conveyance); issues of expert evidence; the status of informal boundary agreements; and court and Land Registry procedure and practice

Outcomes:
After completing the course you will:
  • Understand the types of evidence that may be admissible in court in ascertaining the true location of the boundary (including the status of acts subsequent to the original conveyance);
  • Understand the place of expert evidence, and how it should be managed;
  • Understand the significance of more or less informal boundary agreements;
  • Have an overview of court and Land Registry procedure and practice.
Level:
Intermediate Difficulty: 3 of 5
Classification:
Legal Principles
Practical Guide
Sources and References:
  • Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 s.2;
  • Land Registration Act 2002 ;
  • Land Registry Rules 2003;
  • Alan Wibberley Building Ltd v Insley [1999] 1 WLR 894;
  • Ali v Lane [2006] EWCA Civ 1532; Times, December 4, 2006 (CA (Civ Div));
  • Beale v Harvey [2004] 2 P&CR 18;
  • Clarke v O’Keefe (1997) 80 P&CR 126, 133;
  • Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row [2008] UKHL 55;
  • Derbyshire CC v Fallon [2007] EWHC 1326 (Ch); [2007] 3 E.G.L.R. 44 (Ch D);
  • Falkingham v. Farley, The Times, 11 March 1991;
  • Fisher v. Winch [1939] 1 K.B. 666, C.A.;
  • Hopgood v Brown [1955] 1 WLR 213;
  • Joyce v Rigolli [2004] EWCA Civ 79; (2004) 148 S.J.L.B. 234 (CA (Civ Div));
  • Neilson v Poole [1969] 20 P&CR 909;
  • L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tools Sales Limited [1974] AC 235;
  • St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Finance and Another v Clark (No 2) [1973] 1 WLR 1572;
  • Strachey v Ramage [2008] EWCA Civ 384; [2008] 2 P. & C.R. 8 (CA (Civ Div));
  • Wigginton & Milner Ltd. v. Winster Engineering Ltd. [1978] 1 W.L.R. 1462;
  • Yaxley v Gotts [2000] Ch 162, [1999] 3 WLR 1217, [2001] 1 All ER 711, CA.

This podcast is an introduction to the topic of boundary disputes: how they arise, how the courts approach them, and how they can be settled or otherwise resolved.

Start this CPDcast Activity

© CPDcast.com