- Podcast Location:
- Download it here [file size: 26.9 MB]
- Law Categories:
-
Crime
- CPD Points:
- Up to one point - details »
Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors and Barristers...
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the test: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the test, gain ½ an accredited CPD point (30 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
- Cost:
- Standard rate: £25 - Corporate users will pay less.
- Length:
- 30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute accreditation test) - Streaming Audio:
- Yes Downloadable as MP3: Yes
- Contributor(s):
- Course Aims:
-
This podcast is aimed at practitioners of all levels to give a detailed overview of the law of confiscation orders. The podcast considers the decisions of the House of Lords in the major cases of R v May, R v Green and R v Jennings, and how they have affected the law as it stands today.
- Outcomes:
- After completing the course you will:
- Have received an overview of the facts of the major cases of R v May, R v Green and R v Jennings;
- Understand the concepts of apportionment and multiple recovery, and what the state of the law is today;
- Have learnt the major legal principles coming from these cases and how they are interpreted today.
- Accredited CPD Time:
- 30 minutes
- Level:
- Intermediate
- Sources and References:
-
- Drug Trafficking Act 1994;
- Criminal Justice Act 1988;
- Proceeds of Crime Act 2002;
- R v May 2008 UKHL28;
- R v Green 2008 UKHL 30;
- R v Jenning 2008 UKHL 29;
- R v Porter [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1260.
In this podcast, Ivan Pearce and Simon Taylor, barristers at Furnival Chambers, on the changes in the law regarding confiscation orders since the House of Lords decision in the case of R v May.
The podcast provides a detailed examination of three major cases in this area, R v May, R v Green, R v Jennings: the facts and legal principles in these cases are considered in detail, and the effect they have had on confiscation orders.