- Podcast Location:
-
Download it here
[file size: 30.7 MB]
- Categories:
-
Criminal Law
- CPD Points:
-
Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)
Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
- Cost:
- a) £69+VAT for this CPDcast only
- b) £325+VAT for unlimited access to all of our podcasts. details »
- c) Discounts for multiple users - call +44 (0) 20 3377 3901 now to speak to our sales team
- Length:
- 30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
- Plays on Computer:
-
Yes
Downloadable as MP3:
Yes
- Contributor(s):
-
- Course Aims:
This podcast is aimed at criminal lawyers interested in keeping abreast of recent developments within criminal law and evidence. It touches on a number of pertinent authorities across a broad range of areas including the question of admissibility of bad character evidence, developments concerning hearsay evidence, a recent case concerning the evidence capable of establishing harassment alarm or distress under section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986, a decision regarding the appropriateness of placing ABE transcripts before the jury and developments concerning the admissibility of admissions and confessions.
- Outcomes:
- After completing the course you will:
- Be familiar with the case of Barnard v DPP [2011] EWHC 1648 (Admin) which considered how a tribunal should approach bad character in an appeal to the Crown Court;
- Be aware of recent developments regarding the admissibility of hearsay evidence under the interests of justice gateway by examining both R v Burton [2011] EWCA Crim 1990 and CT v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2341;
- Understand how R v Ashraf [2011] EWCA Crim 1517 assists in determining how to direct the jury in recent complaint cases;
- Have considered the case of Harvey v DPP [2011] EWHC B1 (Admin) which looked at the evidence capable of establishing harassment, alarm or distress under s.5 of the Public Order Act 1986;
- Appreciate the principles arising from the decision in R v Aamir Sardar [2012] EWCA Crim 134 concerning the appropriateness of placing ABE transcripts before the jury;
- Be aware of developments regarding the ambit of s.76 of PACE and the admissibility of confessions and the principles that the case of R v Roberts (Neil) [2011] EWCA Crim 2974) help to confirm.
- Level:
- Specialist
- Classification:
-
Case Update
Legal Principles
- Sources and References:
-
- Al-Khawaja [2005] EWCA Crim 2697 CA (26766/05) ECHR 20 January 2009;
- Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UK (2011) The Times 22 December;
- Barnard v DPP [2011] EWHC 1648 (Admin);
- Burton v R [2011] EWCA Crim 1990;
- Cheeseman v DPP Crim LR [1991] 296-298;
- CT v R [2011] EWCA Crim 2341;
- DPP v Orum [1989] 88 Cr App Rep 261;
- Harvey v DPP [2011] EWHC B1 (Admin);
- Holloway v DPP [2004] EWHC 2621 (Admin);
- McEwan v DPP [2007] EWHC 740 (Admin);
- R v AA [2007] EWCA Crim 1779;
- R v Aamir v Sardar [2012] EWCA Crim 134;
- R v Ashraf [2011] EWCA Crim 1517;
- R v Horncastle [2009] EWCA Crim 964 and [2009] UKSC 14;
- R v Ibrahim [2010] EWCA 1176;
- R v Popescu [2010] EWCA 1230;
- R v Roberts (Neil) [2011] EWCA Crim 2974;
- R v Twist [2011] EWCA Crim 1143;
- R v Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59;
- R v Z [2009] EWCA 20;
- Sak v CPS [2007] EWHC 2886 (Admin).
In this podcast Adrian Lower from the Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division of the CPS discusses recent developments within criminal law and evidence.
Date recorded: 13th Jul 2012
Start this CPDcast Activity