Defining Parenthood under Schedule 1- T v B (2010)
- Podcast Location:
- Download it here [file size: 20.5 MB]
- Categories:
-
Family Law
- CPD Points:
- Up to 1 point. details »
Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)
Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
- Cost:
- a) £65+VAT for this CPDcast only
- b) £299+VAT for unlimited access to all of our podcasts. details »
- c) Discounts for multiple users - call +44 (0) 20 3377 3901 now to speak to our sales team
- Length:
- 30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz) - Plays on Computer:
- Yes Downloadable as MP3: Yes
- Contributor(s):
- Course Aims:
In this podcast Byron James, a barrister at 14 Gray’s Inn Square and Olivia Stiles, a paralegal from Hickman & Rose, discuss Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. The podcast begins by introducing us to Schedule 1, Byron and Olivia then go on to discuss how the courts have addressed the definitions of parenthood for the purposes of Schedule 1 in case law, examining in particular the judgment of Moylan J in T v B [2010] EWHC 1444.
- Outcomes:
- After completing the course you will:
- Understand the circumstances in which an application under Schedule 1 will be sought;
- Know who can make an application under Schedule 1;
- Be able to identify the matters which the court will have regard to in deciding Schedule 1 cases;
- Recognise the difficulties Schedule 1 can present;
- Be aware of the Law Commission’s 2008 recommendations;
- Understand how the courts have approached the definitions of parenthood for the purposes of Schedule1;
- Understand the judgment of Moylan J in the case of T v B [2010] EWHC 1444.
- Level:
- Intermediate
- Classification:
-
Case Update
Legal Principles
- Sources and References:
-
- Schedule 1 Children Act 1989;
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 and 2008 Family Law Reform Act 1987;
- T v B [2010] EWHC 1444;
- Re A (Joint Residence: Parental Responsibility) [2008] 2 FLR 1593;
- J v C (Void Marriage: Status of Children) [2006] 2 FLR 1098;
- Re G (Children) [2006] UKHL 43;
- Re B (Parentage) [1996] 2 FLR 15;
- J v J (A Minor: Property Transfer) [1993] 2 FLR 56;
- M v C and Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [1993] 1 FLR 505;
- 1986 Law Commission Report (Illegitimacy Law Com, No. 157);
- 1982 Law Commission Report (Illegitimacy, Law Com No 118);
- The Warnock Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embyology (July, 1984);
- 1979 Law Commission Working Paper (No.74), ‘Family Law, Illegitimacy’;
- Goldstein, Freud and Solnit, Beyond the Best Interests of the Child (Free Press, 1973).
This podcast looks at Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 and the judgment in T v B [2010] EWHC 1444
Podcast added: 20/12/2010
Podcast last reviewed: 2011-06-20
