Podcast Location:
Sorry, this podcast has been removed as it is now out of date
Categories:
Employment Law
CPD Points:
Up to 1 point. details »

Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)

Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Cost:
  • a) £69+VAT for this CPDcast only
  • b) £325+VAT for unlimited access to all of our podcasts. details »
  • c) Discounts for multiple users - call +44 (0) 20 3377 3901 now to speak to our sales team
Length:
30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
Plays on Computer:
Yes Downloadable as MP3:    Yes
Contributor(s):
Course Aims:

This two part CPDcast aims to examine the laws surrounding harassment, discrimination and stress in the workplace. This second part will analyse the implications of the cases of Hatton v Sutherland and Dickens v O2. It also aims to analyse the overlap between Employment Tribunal Claims and Personal Injury Claims.

Outcomes:
After completing the course you will:
  • Know the background to the case of Hatton v Sutherland;
  • Understand how the case of Hatton handles the issues of duty of care and foreseeability; and causation and apportionment;
  • Appreciate the importance of the case of Sayers;
  • Know the implications of the case of Dickens v O2.
Level:
Intermediate Difficulty: 3 of 5
Classification:
Case Update
Legal Principles
Sources and References:
  • Hatton v Sutherland (2002) EWCA Civ 76;
  • Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Limited (2002);
  • Hone v Six Continents (2005) EWCA Civ 922;
  • Sayers v Cambridgeshire County Council (2006) EWHC 2029 (QB);
  • Dickins v O2 Plc [2008] Civ 1144;
  • Paterson v Surrey Police Authority (2008) EWHC 2693 (QB);
  • Barber v Somerset County Council [2004] UKHL 13.

In this two part CPDcast series, Rachel Dineley and Paula Jefferson from Beachcroft LLP, discuss the laws pertaining to harassment, discrimination and stress in the workplace.

In Part 2, they examine the important ruling of Dickens v O2, the Hatton Guidelines and the overlap between Employment Tribunal Claims and Personal Injury Claims.

Podcast added: 21/07/09

Podcast last reviewed: 2011-05-31

This course has now been removed from the site. It is no longer suitable for CPD purposes as it contains information that is out of date or incorrect. For a list of our latest CPDcasts, please visit the library.

© CPDcast.com