Podcast Location:
Download it here [file size: 42.2 MB]
Categories:
Remedies & Enforcement
CPD Points:
Up to 1 point. details »

Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)

Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Cost:
  • FREE
Length:
30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
Plays on Computer:
Yes Downloadable as MP3:    Yes
Contributor(s):
Course Aims:

This CPDcast provides an overview of the case of Lawrence v Fen Tigers (2014), a Supreme Court case which stands to impact on the discretionary decisions taken by judges when granting injunctions. It gives a detailed account of the case and authority it provides and highlights the principles which can be derived from the case as applying to all manner of legal rights beyond property and nuisance infringements.

Outcomes:
After completing the course you will:
  • Understand the rule created in Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co (1895);
  • Be aware of the facts and background to Lawrence and another v Fen Tigers Ltd and others [2014];
  • Understand the significance of Lawrence and another v Fen Tigers Ltd and others [2014] for nuisance;
  • Have considered the wider impact of Lawrence and another v Fen Tigers Ltd and others [2014] on the court’s discretionary remedy to grant injunction.
Level:
General Interest Difficulty: 2 of 5
Classification:
Market Update / Hot Topic
Sources and References:
  • Lawrence and another v Fen Tigers Ltd and others [2014] UKSC 13;;
  • Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch 287;
  • HKRUK II (CHC) Limited v Marcus Alexander Heaney [2010] EWHC 2245 (Ch);
  • Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269.
Tags:

In this CPDcast, Tom Weekes, a barrister from Landmark Chambers discusses the most recent developments in the law of nuisance and in particular, the Supreme Court case of Lawrence and Fen Tigers (2014).

Date Recorded: 10th August 2014

Start this CPDcast Activity

© CPDcast.com