Podcast Location:
Download it here [file size: 44.6 MB]
Categories:
Human Rights, Civil Liberties & Public Law
Immigration and Asylum Law
CPD Points:
Up to 1 point. details »

Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)

Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Cost:
  • FREE
Length:
30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
Plays on Computer:
Yes Downloadable as MP3:    Yes
Contributor(s):
Course Aims:

This immigration law podcast provides practitioners with an overview of Hamid v SSHD [2012] EWHC 3070 (Admin), an important case arising out of the problem of last-minute applications to the Administrative Court for the purposes of obtaining an injunction to prevent a person being removed from the United Kingdom. It sets out the Divisional Court’s approach in this case and provides a practical guide to the new version of the 'judicial review - application for urgent consideration' form and the consequences for practitioners who fail to fill it out correctly. This is essential listening for all immigration law practitioners!

Outcomes:
After completing the course you will:
  • Appreciate how applications for an order staying removal of non-EU immigrants can be made and the problems arising from the last minute nature of many applications;
  • Understand how the court has responded to the issue of late applications;
  • Be aware of the new forms and rules relating to these types of applications and understand why these changes were introduced;
  • Appreciate the consequences for failing to fill out the N463 form correctly;
  • Understand what the Hamid decision will mean for immigration practitioners.
Level:
General Interest Difficulty: 2 of 5
Classification:
Case Update
Market Update / Hot Topic
Practical Guide
Procedural
Sources and References:
Tags:

In this podcast Samantha Broadfoot from Landmark Chambers discusses last minute judicial reviews and injunctions in immigration cases in light of the recent case of Hamid v SSHD [2012] EWHC 3070 (Admin).

NEW! TRANSCRIPT INCLUDED IN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Date recorded: 10th January 2013

Start this CPDcast Activity

© CPDcast.com