Podcast Location:
Download it here [file size: 24.9 MB]
Categories:
Corporate & Commercial Law
Insolvency & Restructuring
CPD Points:
Up to 1 point. details »

Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)

Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)

Cost:
  • FREE
Length:
30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz)
Plays on Computer:
Yes Downloadable as MP3:    Yes
Contributor(s):
Course Aims:

This podcast is aimed at practitioners involved in insolvency and company law issues. It addresses a series of first instance decisions about the valid appointment of company administrators that all conflict with one another. It aims to explore the issues of merit and issues of precendent in each of them in order to guide practitioners through what has become known as the ‘Minmar Muddle’.

Outcomes:
After completing the course you will:
  • Be aware of the relevant provisions in dispute throughout the four cases discussed in the podcast;
  • Be aware of the facts, decisions and points of contrast in Hill v Stokes, Virtualpurple, Minmar and Masaada;
  • Understand the practical solutions for administrators who find themselves caught in the ‘Minmar Muddle’.
Level:
Complex Difficulty: 4 of 5
Classification:
Case Update
Sources and References:
  • Hill v Stokes plc [2011] BCC 473;
  • Virtualpurple Professional Services Ltd, Re [2011] EWHC 3487 (Ch);
  • Minmar (929) Ltd & Anor v Khalatschi & Anor [2011] EWHC 1159 (Ch);
  • National Westminster Bank plc v Msaada Group & Ors [2011] EWHC 3423 (Ch);
  • Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 Para 22, 26, 27 28, 104,;
  • Insolvency Rule 2.20(2).
Tags:

This podcast explores what has become known as the ‘Minmar Muddle’ – a wrinkle arising in the precedence to be given to a series of recent first instances cases from the Companies Court surrounding the giving of notice of an intention to appoint administrators.

Podcast added: 01/05/12

Start this CPDcast Activity

© CPDcast.com