Part 8 Claims and Recent Construction Adjudication Cases - Part 2
- Podcast Location:
- Download it here [file size: 18.6 MB]
- Categories:
-
Construction, Procurement & Outsourcing
- CPD Points:
- Up to 1 point. details »
Due to the difference in guidelines between the SRA and the Bar Standards Board, CPD points are awarded differently for Solicitors, Barristers and Legal Executives:
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
Regulated by the Bar Standards Board:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 accredited CPD point (60 minutes)
Regulated by ILEX:
Listen and pass the quiz: Gain 1 CPD point (60 minutes)
Listen only, gain ½ a CPD point (30 minutes)
- Cost:
- a) £65+VAT for this CPDcast only
- b) £299+VAT for unlimited access to all of our podcasts. details »
- c) Discounts for multiple users - call +44 (0) 20 3377 3901 now to speak to our sales team
- Length:
- 30 minutes of audio
(+ optional 5 minute online quiz) - Plays on Computer:
- Yes Downloadable as MP3: Yes
- Contributor(s):
- Course Aims:
This two part podcast aims to analyse the key issues surrounding Part 8 claims in relation to adjudication and recent key cases that pertain to the law concerning construction adjudication
- Outcomes:
- After completing the course you will:
- Understand the recent construction adjudication case law pertaining to fraud;
- Appreciate the Court of Appeal approved the decision in SG South v Kings Cirencester;
- Understand the case law surrounding multilple contracts and the pertinence of Supablast;
- Understand the problematic nature of Justice Akenhead's view;
- Know the principles stemming from section 7 of the HGCRA;
- Appreciate the relevance of Galliford Try Construction;
- Know the issues of jurisdiction in this area;
- Appreciate recent cases discussing the issue of election;
- Understand what happened in the case of Pilon v Breyer;
- Appreciate the problematic issues surrounding CFAs and ATE premuims.
- Level:
- Intermediate
- Classification:
-
Case Update
- Sources and References:
-
- Speymill Contracts v Baskind (CA) [2010] BLR 257;
- SG South v Kings Head Cirencester LLP [2010] BLR 47;
- GPS Marine Contractors Ltd v Ringway Infrastructure Service [2010] EWHC 283 (TCC);
- Supablast v Story Rail [2010] EWHC 56 (TCC);
- Nickleby v Somerfield Stores [2010] EWHC 1976 (TCC);
- All Metal Roofing v Kamm [2010] EWHC 2670 (TCC);
- ROK Building v Bestwood Carpentry [2010] EWHC 1409 (TCC);
- Galliford Try Construction v Michael Heal Associates [2003] EWHC 2886 (TCC);
- Cleveland Bridge v Whessoe-Volker Stevin [2010] EWHC 1076 (TCC);
- Aedifice Partnership v Shah [2010] EWHC 2106 (TCC);
- Redworth Construction v Brookdale Healthcare [2006] EWHC 1994 (TCC);
- Quartzelec v Honeywell Control Systems [2008] BLR 328;
- Filetum v Royal Garden Hotel [2010] EWHC 1409 (TCC);
- Volker Stevin v Holystone [2010] EWHC 2344 (TCC); Redwing Construction v Wishart [2011] EWHC 19 (TCC);
- Straw Realisations v Shaftsbury House [2010] EWHC 2597 (TCC);
- Lee v Chartered Properties (Building) [2010] EWHC 1540 (TCC).
In this two part CPDcast, Stephen Walker of Atkin Chambers examines Part 8 Claims and other adjudication cases. In part one, he considers the circumstances in which Part 8 claims are used in the context of adjudication, including cases where such a claim may enable a party to escape the enforcement of an adverse decision. In part two, he addresses other significant cases decided during 2010 relating to the law concerning construction adjudication
Podcast last reviewed: 2012-03-22
