After completing all training podcasts in this bundle you will:
This podcast bundle features a selection of podcasts on the topic of local authority decision making in children cases. It will consider the role of assessments and the legal obligations of a local authority regarding provisions of care and services to “children in need”, their responsibilities for housing teenagers and the assessment process in age dispute claims. This podcast bundle will help you to understand when and how such decisions can be challenged.
CPDcast training bundles contain a hand-picked selection of our CPDcasts that together will provide you with a discrete in-depth analysis of specific legal developments from scrutiny of the statutes and case law to practical application.
Assessment & Decision Making in Children Cases contains the following CPDcasts:
This two-part CPDcast series is aimed at those interested in how the correct age of young asylum seekers will be determined and when local authority decisions on these cases can be challenged.
Part One will consider the issue of age assessment and its importance, it will then look at the legal position before and after the case of R (A) v Croydon before starting to look at who will be the relevant defendant for the purposes of a fact finding hearing.
Part Two will look at the standard and burden of proof in age dispute cases, the role medical and documentary evidence has played in recent cases, a consideration of the courts approach since the decision in R (A) v Croydon, the approach of the UK Border Agency to these cases and why these cases are being transferred. It will then look at how to prepare an age dispute claim, giving guidance to practitioners on the practical steps to be taken.
After completing this course you will:
This two-part CPDcast series is aimed at those interested in how the correct age of young asylum seekers will be determined and when local authority decisions on these cases can be challenged.
Part One will consider the issue of age assessment and its importance, it will then look at the legal position before and after the case of R (A) v Croydon before starting to look at who will be the relevant defendant for the purposes of a fact finding hearing.
Part Two will look at the standard and burden of proof in age dispute cases, the role medical and documentary evidence has played in recent cases, a consideration of the courts approach since the decision in R (A) v Croydon, the approach of the UK Border Agency to these cases and why these cases are being transferred. It will then look at how to prepare an age dispute claim, giving guidance to practitioners on the practical steps to be taken.
After completing this course you will:
This podcast is aimed at practitioners interested in the Local Authority decision making process in children cases specifically focusing on the role of assessments and the lessons learned from the tragic cases of Victoria Climbie and ‘Baby P’.
In order to examine the assessment process the podcast considers "children in need" under section 17 Children Act 1989, the Framework Guidance, the initial and core assessment stage, the importance of proper plans and the role of the Administrative Court.
After completing this course you will:
This two part podcast series is aimed at practitioners interested in the obligations on Local Authorities to provide care for teenage children.
Part One will consider Section 20 of the Children Act 1989, the extent to which Children’s Services are responsible for housing teenagers, how to identify a ‘looked after’ teenager, and how Local Authorities have sought to limit support for children and families under this provision.
Part Two will continue to consider cases in which Local Authorities have managed to escape responsibility under section 20 before going on to consider cases in which the courts have taken a Local Authority’s actions as having being exercised pursuant to section 20 Children Act 1989. It will then look at recent legislative developments in this area before looking at Local Authority responsibilities towards older teenagers.
After completing this course you will:
This two part podcast series is aimed at practitioners interested in the obligations on Local Authorities to provide care for teenage children.
Part One will consider Section 20 of the Children Act 1989, the extent to which Children’s Services are responsible for housing teenagers, how to identify a ‘looked after’ teenager, and how Local Authorities have sought to limit support for children and families under this provision.
Part Two will continue to consider cases in which Local Authorities have managed to escape responsibility under section 20 before going on to consider cases in which the courts have taken a Local Authority’s actions as having being exercised pursuant to section 20 Children Act 1989. It will then look at recent legislative developments in this area before looking at Local Authority responsibilities towards older teenagers.
After completing this course you will:
Assessment & Decision Making in Children Cases features the following legal experts:
Leslie Samuels is Head of the Public Law Children Team and the Judicial Review Team and is in charge of Continuing Professional Education for the Family Finance Team. He sits as a Deputy District Judge in the Principal Registry of the Family Division in London. He is a qualified mediator.
Azeem Suterwalla specialises in public law and human rights law across a range of subject areas, notably, community care, children related, education, immigration, asylum support and prison law and housing cases. Azeem also has a developing media law practice.
Prior to coming to the bar Azeem worked for two years as a Policy Analyst for the United Nations in the Middle East. Azeem was also the Judicial Assistant to the former Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Anthony Clarke, in the Court of Appeal between October and December 2005.
He is author of the chapter "Collection and Retention of Person Data" in the OUP publication "Human Rights in the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime" (2009), edited by Madeleine Colvin and Jonathan Cooper.